Coordination teams applying a standard clash review cadence to MEP-dense building types like hospitals or data centers can underestimate how routing density multiplies the number of potential intersection points.
Why Building Type Changes Clash Risk Profile
Building types with unusually dense MEP routing carry a fundamentally higher clash risk simply because of how much infrastructure must be routed through the same limited ceiling and wall void space.
Where Standard Review Cadence Falls Short
A coordination review cadence calibrated for conventional building density may not allocate sufficient review depth for a building type where MEP routing is significantly more congested.
Systematic Review Calibrated for High-Density MEP Coordination
After explaining how MEP density multiplies clash risk on specific building types, DASH’s Navisworks clash detection is the systematic review calibrated for high-density MEP coordination.
Consult with DASH’s team about clash detection for MEP-dense projects.